Michael Hurst
Nov 18, 2021

I am arguing against the argument, it is not about you. Note that in an earlier post I assumed you were a theist, but in my last post I make no such assumption, only that you are arguing the point of theists. Re: the highlighted section, you are ignoring that their was a "1)" before the 2), preceded by "either", and you have argued for point 1).

Michael Hurst
Michael Hurst

Written by Michael Hurst

Economist and public policy analyst, cyclist and paddler, and incorrigible old coot.

No responses yet