This story could be labeled "critical logic failure". First, the first sentence defining CRT is not exactly accurate, as CRT focuses on people of color, albeit the major example used, the most egregious and easily identifiable, is Blacks vs. Whites.
Second, the first premise in your taxonomy does not follow, even from Xu's definition in the interview. CRT does not place the same weight of racism and discrimination on all minorities. CRT does not say that no minority could be successful. CRT is "...a socially constructed (culturally invented) category that is used to oppress and exploit people of colour." But it does not say that such oppression and exploitation is the same among all POC.
Descriptions of racial discrimination by Asians most often pale dramatically to what we see happening every day to Blacks in the news. The level and type of oppression of Asians is a pittance compared to Blacks in America. Mr. Xu himself says in the interview that "America has been very good to me, and America has been good to every person in every (?) of this country." I wonder what the blank was, but the absurdity of this statement cannot be overstressed.
Your third sentence is true and false. It all depends on how you define success. Xu, and you, are defining "success" as financial success. But financial success can be achieved despite racial discrimination. Asians in America do still experience violent racist attacks, microagressions, and stereotyping and ridicule quite often in America. They manage financial success, for sure, but not because there is no racism.
Another important logical failure is embedded in your third premise. I could just as easily say "Black Americans, as a group, are very unsuccessful in America". Taken together with premise one, the two premises together suggest that Asian Americans are successful and African Americans are not, given the same circumstances. But this implies that the two groups are "similarly situated", a critical term required in any legal case comparing two entities.
But the two groups have never been and are not now similarly situated. Asians migrated in large numbers first to the US in the 1800s, to take advantage of jobs from the expansion of the West. These were poor migrants, but they were nevertheless economic migrants, meaning they were among the best of their cohorts in their countries, and they were paid, and began to assimilate and build fortunes. After the Chinese Exclusion Act, Chinese immigration slowed to a trickle until the Immigration and Nationality Act in 1965. After which immigration has been focused on either family reunification, or relevant skills and/or financial status. Chinese and almost all other Asian immigrants for a few generations now have been those who are the most educated to begin with, often more than native-born Whites, and many are students at American universities who stay after graduation, so they are set up for success in America. And subsequently their children born in America are situated in relatively affluent households and get better educations, and are likewise set up for success. Even Asian refugees from countries like the Philippines or Vietnam often arrive in the country with substantial financial assets which allow them to start their own businesses or fund higher education for their children.
Contrast that to the experience of Blacks in America. Even refugees of other races have had it better than Blacks. Blacks were forced to come here against their will, in chains. For 250 years they were slaves, and for another 100 they have been victims of Jim Crow laws that deliberately, forcefully, and legally EXCLUDED them from the institutions, programs, education, jobs, or financial assistance that could bring them out of poverty. It has been shown that one of the most important criteria for future success of a child in America is the socio-economic status of the parents. The discrimination against Blacks has been the driving force that has kept them down, far more than anything experienced by Asians.
The situation for African Americans is not and has never been at all comparable to Asian Americans. So for Xu to point to the financial success of Asian Americans as proof that there is no racism in America is not only preposterous. It is disingenuous (which makes it perfect for a spot on Faux News), and damaging to any attempt to end such racism.
