You don't know a whit about what you are bloviating about. Absolutely the science in chemistry and physics comes to harder conclusions than the science of economics. The physical sciences study set physical processes, laws of nature that are immutable . The science of economics ends up with less certainty because it is studying human behavior with its immense variance.

Nevertheless, we use many of the same analytical methods and processes used in other sciences to study millions of pieces of observational data, and occasionally we even do experiments. The other disciplines I mentioned, such as psychology and politics, also use science to study their fields, and I'm sure you think those are not scientific either. You claim to be a philosopher, and according to your standards philosophy is not a science either. But philosophy was originally called "philosophical science", and is arguable the first science in world history.

Science is a process of study, a method to gain knowledge about a subject using a wide range of testing and analytical techniques. It is not "chemistry" or "physics". You are not an economist, you are clearly baby-like ignorant what we do. But that doesn't stop you from pontificating from outside based on your own prejudices. If this is how you lecture to your students, I am really glad I am not in your classes.

Please don't bother my inbox with your hysterical nonsense any further.